<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Criterica insights and news</title>
  <subtitle>Essays and announcements from Criterica, the risk intelligence company.</subtitle>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://criterica.com/feed.xml"/>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://criterica.com/"/>
  <id>https://criterica.com/feed.xml</id>
  <updated>2026-09-17T12:00:00Z</updated>
  <author><name>Criterica</name><uri>https://criterica.com</uri></author>
  <entry>
    <title>ABS Structures and Law Firm Economics</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://criterica.com/insights/abs-structures-and-law-firm-economics"/>
    <id>https://criterica.com/insights/abs-structures-and-law-firm-economics</id>
    <published>2026-09-17T12:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-09-17T12:00:00Z</updated>
    <category term="Capital Formation"/>
    <summary>Alternative business structure frameworks get discussed as a governance question. They are a capital-formation event, converting a law firm's financing menu from debt and receivables into a full stack that includes equity.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Calibrated Probability Is the Institutional Standard</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://criterica.com/insights/calibrated-probability-is-the-institutional-standard"/>
    <id>https://criterica.com/insights/calibrated-probability-is-the-institutional-standard</id>
    <published>2026-09-17T12:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-09-17T12:00:00Z</updated>
    <category term="Model Governance"/>
    <summary>What separates a measured probability from a confident guess, how calibration is actually tested, and what an institutional counterparty should demand before pricing capital against someone else’s number.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Calibration as a Governance Object</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://criterica.com/insights/calibration-as-a-governance-object"/>
    <id>https://criterica.com/insights/calibration-as-a-governance-object</id>
    <published>2026-09-17T12:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-09-17T12:00:00Z</updated>
    <category term="Governance"/>
    <summary>Calibration is a statistical property until an institution has to govern it. What ownership, versioning, and escalation actually look like once a model is running against live capital.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Concentration Risk in Legal Portfolios</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://criterica.com/insights/concentration-risk-in-legal-portfolios"/>
    <id>https://criterica.com/insights/concentration-risk-in-legal-portfolios</id>
    <published>2026-09-17T12:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-09-17T12:00:00Z</updated>
    <category term="Underwriting"/>
    <summary>A legal portfolio can look diversified by case type and jurisdiction while concentrating in a single judge, a single legal theory, or a single defendant. The four axes a standard credit framework misses.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Disclosure Regimes and What They Change for Capital</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://criterica.com/insights/disclosure-regimes-and-what-they-change-for-capital"/>
    <id>https://criterica.com/insights/disclosure-regimes-and-what-they-change-for-capital</id>
    <published>2026-09-17T12:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-09-17T12:00:00Z</updated>
    <category term="Capital Formation"/>
    <summary>Litigation funding disclosure requirements are usually filed under compliance. They belong in underwriting, because they change the negotiating dynamics and the structures a jurisdiction will actually support.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Insurance and Litigation Finance Convergence</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://criterica.com/insights/insurance-and-litigation-finance-convergence"/>
    <id>https://criterica.com/insights/insurance-and-litigation-finance-convergence</id>
    <published>2026-09-17T12:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-09-17T12:00:00Z</updated>
    <category term="Capital Formation"/>
    <summary>Insurance and litigation finance are converging, not around a shared product, but around a shared requirement for calibrated outcome and duration data neither industry historically had in-house.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Judgment Portfolios as an Asset Class</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://criterica.com/insights/judgment-portfolios-as-an-asset-class"/>
    <id>https://criterica.com/insights/judgment-portfolios-as-an-asset-class</id>
    <published>2026-09-17T12:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-09-17T12:00:00Z</updated>
    <category term="Market Structure"/>
    <summary>A judgment is not a smaller version of the claim that preceded it. Why appellate and collection risk require their own pricing discipline, distinct from pre-resolution litigation finance.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Jurisdiction as a Pricing Input</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://criterica.com/insights/jurisdiction-as-a-pricing-input"/>
    <id>https://criterica.com/insights/jurisdiction-as-a-pricing-input</id>
    <published>2026-09-17T12:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-09-17T12:00:00Z</updated>
    <category term="Underwriting"/>
    <summary>Jurisdiction is usually a go/no-go screen at intake. Priced correctly, it is a continuous, granular input that shifts outcome and duration distributions more than most case-specific facts.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Medical Lien Behavior as a Data Asset</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://criterica.com/insights/medical-lien-behavior-as-a-data-asset"/>
    <id>https://criterica.com/insights/medical-lien-behavior-as-a-data-asset</id>
    <published>2026-09-17T12:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-09-17T12:00:00Z</updated>
    <category term="Data"/>
    <summary>Medical liens are usually treated as an administrative line item. Examined at scale, lien behavior is a structured signal for injury severity, settlement timing, and net-to-claimant value.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Outcome Lifecycle: Predict, Underwrite, Deploy, Monitor, Resolve</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://criterica.com/insights/outcome-lifecycle-predict-underwrite-deploy-monitor-resolve"/>
    <id>https://criterica.com/insights/outcome-lifecycle-predict-underwrite-deploy-monitor-resolve</id>
    <published>2026-09-17T12:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-09-17T12:00:00Z</updated>
    <category term="Platform Architecture"/>
    <summary>Five stages, two functions, one closed loop. Why prediction and underwriting cannot be the same act, and why the loop breaks the moment resolved outcomes stop flowing back into the model.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Regulated Markets as the Unit of Analysis</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://criterica.com/insights/regulated-markets-as-the-unit-of-analysis"/>
    <id>https://criterica.com/insights/regulated-markets-as-the-unit-of-analysis</id>
    <published>2026-09-17T12:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-09-17T12:00:00Z</updated>
    <category term="Market Structure"/>
    <summary>Practice area is the wrong unit for organizing legal outcome intelligence. Why the regulated market a matter moves through, not its subject matter, determines what a model can actually learn.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Regulated Outcomes as an Asset Class</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://criterica.com/insights/regulated-outcomes-as-an-asset-class"/>
    <id>https://criterica.com/insights/regulated-outcomes-as-an-asset-class</id>
    <published>2026-09-17T12:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-09-17T12:00:00Z</updated>
    <category term="Market Structure"/>
    <summary>Litigation, regulatory enforcement, and insured claims are three professions built on the same structure. That structure, not the subject matter, is what makes a category underwritable.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Settlement Distributions Versus Point Estimates</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://criterica.com/insights/settlement-distributions-versus-point-estimates"/>
    <id>https://criterica.com/insights/settlement-distributions-versus-point-estimates</id>
    <published>2026-09-17T12:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-09-17T12:00:00Z</updated>
    <category term="Underwriting"/>
    <summary>A single settlement figure is a guess wearing a measurement's clothes. What a labeled distribution actually claims, and why the difference changes how capital should be sized.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Borrowing Base for Legal Receivables</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://criterica.com/insights/the-borrowing-base-for-legal-receivables"/>
    <id>https://criterica.com/insights/the-borrowing-base-for-legal-receivables</id>
    <published>2026-09-17T12:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-09-17T12:00:00Z</updated>
    <category term="Capital Formation"/>
    <summary>Asset-based lending's borrowing base structure extends to legal receivables, but the collateral behaves nothing like an invoice. What eligibility, advance rate, and re-scoring have to look like.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Case Against AI Confidence Scores</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://criterica.com/insights/the-case-against-ai-confidence-scores"/>
    <id>https://criterica.com/insights/the-case-against-ai-confidence-scores</id>
    <published>2026-09-17T12:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-09-17T12:00:00Z</updated>
    <category term="Governance"/>
    <summary>A confidence score and a calibrated probability can look identical and mean nothing alike. Why institutional decisions should treat an unlabeled confidence score as a self-report, not a measurement.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Economics of a Second Deployment</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://criterica.com/insights/the-economics-of-a-second-deployment"/>
    <id>https://criterica.com/insights/the-economics-of-a-second-deployment</id>
    <published>2026-09-17T12:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-09-17T12:00:00Z</updated>
    <category term="Platform Architecture"/>
    <summary>A platform's real underwriting edge is invisible in its first deployment. Why construction cost, not marginal cost, dominates the economics of an early cohort, and what that means for new entrants.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Role of the Human Decision in an Automated Pipeline</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://criterica.com/insights/the-role-of-the-human-decision-in-an-automated-pipeline"/>
    <id>https://criterica.com/insights/the-role-of-the-human-decision-in-an-automated-pipeline</id>
    <published>2026-09-17T12:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-09-17T12:00:00Z</updated>
    <category term="Platform Architecture"/>
    <summary>A rules-based, non-generative pipeline can carry a matter from raw data to a structured output. Where the human decision belongs in that chain, and why automating it away hides accountability rather than removing it.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Two Audit Trails: Predict and Underwrite</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://criterica.com/insights/the-two-audit-trails-predict-and-underwrite"/>
    <id>https://criterica.com/insights/the-two-audit-trails-predict-and-underwrite</id>
    <published>2026-09-17T12:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-09-17T12:00:00Z</updated>
    <category term="Governance"/>
    <summary>A prediction record and an underwriting record answer different questions and have to exist as separate, timestamped artifacts, or no one can tell a bad model from a bad price after the fact.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>What a Sealed Baseline Is For</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://criterica.com/insights/what-a-sealed-baseline-is-for"/>
    <id>https://criterica.com/insights/what-a-sealed-baseline-is-for</id>
    <published>2026-09-17T12:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-09-17T12:00:00Z</updated>
    <category term="Platform Architecture"/>
    <summary>Without a frozen reference point, 'we got better' and 'nothing material changed' are both unfalsifiable claims. What a sealed baseline is, and the three places it actually matters.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>What an Institutional Data Room Should Contain</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://criterica.com/insights/what-an-institutional-data-room-should-contain"/>
    <id>https://criterica.com/insights/what-an-institutional-data-room-should-contain</id>
    <published>2026-09-17T12:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-09-17T12:00:00Z</updated>
    <category term="Data"/>
    <summary>A data room for a model-driven outcomes platform has to make the underlying data science diligenceable, not just the financials. Five sections most data rooms skip.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>What Courts Can Learn From Outcome Data</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://criterica.com/insights/what-courts-can-learn-from-outcome-data"/>
    <id>https://criterica.com/insights/what-courts-can-learn-from-outcome-data</id>
    <published>2026-09-17T12:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-09-17T12:00:00Z</updated>
    <category term="Market Structure"/>
    <summary>Most of this market asks what capital can learn from courts. The reverse question, what courts can learn from their own outcome data, is underexplored and carefully bounded.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Why Duration Is the Underpriced Variable</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://criterica.com/insights/why-duration-is-the-underpriced-variable"/>
    <id>https://criterica.com/insights/why-duration-is-the-underpriced-variable</id>
    <published>2026-09-17T12:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-09-17T12:00:00Z</updated>
    <category term="Platform Architecture"/>
    <summary>A multiple hides the one variable that moves an annualized return more than almost any contested merits question. Why duration needs its own distribution, not a placeholder date.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Why Realized Outcomes Activate Claims Per Asset Class</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://criterica.com/insights/why-realized-outcomes-activate-claims-per-asset-class"/>
    <id>https://criterica.com/insights/why-realized-outcomes-activate-claims-per-asset-class</id>
    <published>2026-09-17T12:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-09-17T12:00:00Z</updated>
    <category term="Underwriting"/>
    <summary>Neither claiming realized-dollar prediction everywhere nor ruling it out permanently is correct. Why the claim activates one asset class at a time, on preregistered evidence.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Why the Corpus Must Be Deduplicated Before It Is Counted</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://criterica.com/insights/why-the-corpus-must-be-deduplicated-before-it-is-counted"/>
    <id>https://criterica.com/insights/why-the-corpus-must-be-deduplicated-before-it-is-counted</id>
    <published>2026-09-17T12:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-09-17T12:00:00Z</updated>
    <category term="Data"/>
    <summary>A raw record count is one of the easiest numbers to inflate by accident. Why every downstream claim, including a base rate's real sample size, inherits a corpus's duplication.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Criterica Group publishes the Regulated Outcome Lifecycle and an inaugural Insights series.</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://criterica.com/news/criterica-group-outcome-lifecycle-and-insights-series"/>
    <id>https://criterica.com/news/criterica-group-outcome-lifecycle-and-insights-series</id>
    <published>2026-09-17T12:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-09-17T12:00:00Z</updated>
    <category term="RESEARCH"/>
    <summary>Criterica Group formalizes The Regulated Outcome Lifecycle — the five-stage, closed-loop architecture underlying every Criterica product — and publishes the first three long-form Insights essays: on why prediction and underwriting are distinct functions, what separates a calibrated probability from a confident guess, and why litigation, regulatory enforcement, and insured claims form a single underwritable asset class.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Criterica Capital expands its institutional resource library.</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://criterica.com/news/criterica-capital-resource-library-expansion"/>
    <id>https://criterica.com/news/criterica-capital-resource-library-expansion</id>
    <published>2026-09-10T12:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-09-10T12:00:00Z</updated>
    <category term="CAPITAL"/>
    <summary>Criterica Capital, Criterica Group's capital deployment affiliate, added a structure comparison library, an expanded legal-finance glossary, and portfolio-finance and commercial-litigation financing coverage across all 50 states and Washington, D.C.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Criterica Intelligence publishes For Funders underwriting guides and the first quarterly market briefs.</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://criterica.com/news/criterica-intelligence-for-funders-guides-and-market-briefs"/>
    <id>https://criterica.com/news/criterica-intelligence-for-funders-guides-and-market-briefs</id>
    <published>2026-09-08T12:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-09-08T12:00:00Z</updated>
    <category term="INTELLIGENCE"/>
    <summary>Criterica Intelligence launches a library of underwriting guides written for litigation funders and a set of quarterly outcomes briefs covering the verticals Criterica serves — from case-selection criteria that differ by practice area to what drove outcomes across each market through the third quarter of 2026, with a stated view on what to watch next quarter.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Criterica Atlas launches autonomous investment committee memo and intelligence panel.</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://criterica.com/news/atlas-investment-committee-memo-and-intelligence-panel"/>
    <id>https://criterica.com/news/atlas-investment-committee-memo-and-intelligence-panel</id>
    <published>2026-06-26T12:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-06-26T12:00:00Z</updated>
    <category term="PLATFORM"/>
    <summary>Atlas, Criterica's litigation finance operating platform, now generates a 9-section bank-grade Investment Committee memo per deal — auto-scoring outcome probability, judicial intelligence, financial projections, and settlement analysis into an APPROVE / CONDITIONAL / DECLINE recommendation. The Intelligence Panel surfaces win probability, comparable case distributions, and judge profiles directly in the deal flow. Atlas is available by invitation to qualified institutional funds.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Criterica Intelligence expands the court-record corpus following Pass 44 completion.</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://criterica.com/news/court-record-corpus-expansion-pass-44"/>
    <id>https://criterica.com/news/court-record-corpus-expansion-pass-44</id>
    <published>2026-06-18T12:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-06-18T12:00:00Z</updated>
    <category term="DATA"/>
    <summary>The Criterica Intelligence training substrate — the master index underlying all production outcome models — grew following the completion of Pass 44 data integration, adding a fresh wave of normalized court and regulatory records. The corpus continues to span federal, state, and international tribunals across a growing set of markets. Pass 45 is underway with additional municipal and administrative data sources.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Production model fleet grows with IP, financial, and commercial sweeps across circuits, districts, and states.</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://criterica.com/news/production-model-fleet-waves-s-through-w"/>
    <id>https://criterica.com/news/production-model-fleet-waves-s-through-w</id>
    <published>2026-06-05T12:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-06-05T12:00:00Z</updated>
    <category term="MODELS"/>
    <summary>Criterica Intelligence promotes a new wave of production outcome models following the completion of Waves S, T, U, V, and W — covering patent, copyright, trademark, securities, RICO, antitrust, commercial, and environmental litigation across all 12 federal circuits, qualifying district courts, and 50 states. The model registry now spans production, experimental, and stub status across every wave to date.</summary>
  </entry>
</feed>
